Raymond Graber Amish Accident Reading Michigan Donation

You know well-nigh how individuals proceeds command of the power of the Country and so corruption that power like old Us President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the state of war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Republic of iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush Uk The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the U.s.a. with faked "intelligence" of Republic of iraq'southward weapons of mass destruction which did non exist but which Blair claimed could exist deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all call back that then you volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can relieve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about every bit a result of the interaction of three completely dissimilar factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself not to take:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was especially the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's beginning park built after rich feared disease spread from slums United kingdom The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would continue them safe from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non work and sometimes killed as many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the illness: Smallpox Bloodshed, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively curt but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- Uk, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the big numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatsoever scientific analysis of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox decease rates plummeted [see table beneath].  Leicester's approach also toll far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruation.	Pocket-size-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Great britain)	1860-1908	1,355	96	seven.one
British Army (Bharat)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	eight.0
Grand Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I accept given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, so that they may be compared either style with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I enquire, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical written report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a respective result—but on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Modest-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-scale-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	v.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.ten	£one,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its outset. Where did the thought of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the aforementioned basic tale of the vivid observation of a uncomplicated country md and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'southward hands. The boy came downward with a slight fever, just zip more. Later on, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more than; once more, nothing. [one]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the dauntless hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a uncomplicated and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic condition while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using pocket-size amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of good for you people. This idea was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practise of inoculation against smallpox, known every bit variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted it at some mayhap less desirable fourth dimension and identify in the time to come.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically expert. Just because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could merely exist afforded past the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often assist protect the individual that was inoculated, simply there was yet an estimated ii-5% that died as a outcome.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a xx-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[six] But, was the difference in bloodshed due to inoculation lonely? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had meliorate access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and by and large unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the exercise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later on, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Yet, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect ane from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to run into if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Simply he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the showtime there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and then tested by existence inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[nine]

Vaccination was chop-chop embraced by many in the medical profession as the reply to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the twelvemonth 1799. A month afterward it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. two. A adult female-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she defenseless pocket-size-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was curtained. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a year subsequently vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upward to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct claiming to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination past the most skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly bang-up.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no ane in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating i,200 persons, he became disappointed in the hope of vaccination. His feel was that, afterward vaccination, people still could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new grade of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to accept spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed close to habitation to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox earlier, and oft severely; almost to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lonely, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real small-pox later, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" form, which meant that cloth was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[xviii] This faulty belief would outcome in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were also reports of deaths from other causes soon afterwards vaccination. For instance, a skin condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful manner to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "pocket-sized-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of iv months; one cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; ii skillful cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged ten weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas later vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Showtime I rejected the idea that syphilis could exist transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. At present I do non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what it was promised to exist, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set up of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zip to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the near severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no result at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the twenty years later the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the force of constabulary created the perfect surroundings that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western earth.

The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they volition get nigh a quarter meg. Other sums, as well, which I cannot name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A not bad pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-iii thousand iv hundred and threescore-ix cases of pocket-size-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand iii hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six g eight hundred and 50-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than 1 hundred and twenty-ii thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from minor-pox . . . Official returns from Germany evidence that between 1870 and 1885 ane meg vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the keen demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new authorities that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the demand for vaccination. Withal, there were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," specially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph ii). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an centre-opener to the people and an center-sore to the pro-vaccinists the earth over. Here is a bully manufacturing town having a population of virtually a quarter of a 1000000, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an feel extending over a period of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abased vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oft promoted as a safe procedure, information technology often caused sickness or fifty-fifty expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph ii: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its grapheme. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the U.s.a.. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from one in fifty and afterward to as low equally 1 in 380. The illness could still kill, but having become so much milder, information technology was often mistaken for diverse other pox infections or peel eruptions.

During 1896 a very balmy type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very depression and it [smallpox] was usually at outset mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around 20%, as it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death charge per unit barbarous off rapidly, starting with half dozen% in 1897 to every bit low as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important considering it ofttimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major issue, the practise of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox expiry in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which ii died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to be between 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality charge per unit of iv to xl%.[35] All the same, they best-selling that virtually cases were not reported and there was no accurate bookkeeping on this consequence of vaccination. There were as well an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military begetter after the father was vaccinated. Afterward a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could really accept been even higher. This written report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a land with a modernistic wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays across the unabridged world?

In that location were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and peradventure afraid that if we did the accident of some time to come epidemic might put united states of america in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination equally near the but medically promoted way to deal with illness, in that location were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. Yard. Oliphant, Thou.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to pocket-sized pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable every bit a safety in small-pox than Belladonna in cherry-red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe as well demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the affliction. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used three or four times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the peachy men who for a century by have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Whatsoever person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take 2 or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar iii or four times a 24-hour interval." The discussion may now exist regarded as closed, and smallpox at final is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but but because most people take been conditioned to accept the age-onetime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected brute's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or only an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and as well gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-scarce diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amidst the aureate miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living about entirely upon fried salary or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the aforementioned time subjected to the almost intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated x,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the adjacent common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such every bit smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a effect of their wounds deemed only for 1 pct of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive reject of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half dozen: England and Wales measles bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. But the truthful history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is cypher close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward peachy discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a practiced idea to you?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can be establish on amazon.com

Bibliography:
ane.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
six.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nihon, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
seven."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Admirer'southward Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Md, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
nineteen.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.a.," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning time Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, Feb 1909, p. l-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.M. W. Harman, MD, "A Physician'southward Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. i, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June one, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Wellness, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, Doc, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. 3, no. xvi, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Communicable diseases equally Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume ane, West.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January one, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acid in Carmine Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Scientific discipline, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Preclude Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'southward College," Medical Times, vol. 23, Jan four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Written report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Condom, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

smithlowee1994.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post